Friday, July 21, 2006

Is reservation the actual issue?

Not too long ago, the students in India protested against the goverment's decision to increase quota for students belonging to OBCs(Other Backward Castes). To people who do not know anything about the caste heirarchy, these are people who do not fall in the top band. Read more here.

There was an active debate in the country. Both sides presented their case pretty well. It is hard to not see the good and bad in reservation. But in the end It is just another way to seggregate.
I come from a state in India where caste was a curse to its people. But now, years after Independence, caste has more or less become a non-issue. Caste, now, is a thing that politicians try to use it to their advantage but fail mostly because the literate people of Kerala see clearly through it. Some organisations like NSS and SNDP try to rally people around caste, but the common man doesn't care. I grew up listening to my parents and school tell me 'Trying to find out the caste of a person is rude', 'What matters is the character of a person and not his/her religion' et cetera(poor translation of the Malayalam version). Kerala, is slightly better than most other states in India in terms of 'caste-ism' or caste based crimes. Keralites achieved a level of social maturity/ conditioning because of the visionaries like Ayyankali, Sree Narayana Guru, and K Kelappan who identified the cause and reformed. They denounced the caste system. This is what we need to revive and not reservation.

Unfortunately, we do not see politicians talk against caste as that would erode their vote base. The state seems to endorse it by asking you to fill up your caste and its variations in application forms of any sort. But what is more unfortunate is that those learned young men and women who were against reservation did not speak out against the caste system!! Their protest was against reservation based on the caste system and its fallacy.

Until we realize the true evil nature of caste on present day society and abolish caste based seggregation I dont see the problem going away. And for that, we need to uproot the concept of caste from our minds. Only such a change in our thought process will bring India out of this madness. And that is when we can call ourself a developed nation.

Thursday, July 06, 2006

This highway may have a toll booth ahead...

There is a lot of noise about net neutrality in the air. Your Internet Service Providers(ISPs) want to charge the biggies on the internet for hogging bandwidth. The fight is on between Comcast, AT&T ... Vs. Microsoft,Yahoo,Google ... and the arena is the US Congress. Senators and congressmen will decide who gets the bigger slice of the pie. No matter what, the lobbyists will get their share.

If we breakdown the case for net neutrality, the ISPs demand can be compared to the government charging Walmart, Target and Macys because their customers use public roads to drive up to their shops. If Walmart pays the additional fee, their customers can drive at say 10mph faster than others. These customers are charged seperately in taxes and toll booths that pepper the freeways just like we the monthly charges that we pay for our dial-up/DSL/cable internet connection. The ISPs will decide which website/page will download faster based on how much the website's owner is willing to pay.

Some may argue that the TV channels operate this way. You have to pay for premium channels and try to apply this logic to internet. I say that it is not a fair comparison because internet is not just an information dissemination medium. Its much more that that.Its interactive. Its an extension of our society. Its a place where we share values and beliefs,buy and sell services, gain and share knowledge, a place for philanthropy and misanthropy.

It maybe a little late for the ISPs to demand this. But they definitely will because the ISP oligopoly sees green. They definitely will try hard for they have the muscle to do so. The ISPs know that the Net companies are dependent on them to deliver content to the end user. But they also see what most of us do not see. To treat each information packet as a product that can be 'taxed'. For example, information flowing from Europe or Asia can be charged an access fee to enter the US market.

In the end, if they succeed its us(internet users,entrepreneurs,innovators ) who lose. An innovative network of home wireless networks maybe the alternative if ISPs succeed.

But the pie actually belongs to us. Not Microsoft, not Google, not Comcast, not AT&T and I have been paying for the pie every month(not counting the first few where I used my neighbour's network :)).

Some articles on net neutrality:
Lawrence Lessig : Founder of Creative Commons
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/07/AR2006060702108.html

Tim Berners Lee: Inventor of Internet/ chairman of WorldWideWeb consortium
http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144

and the mighty source of info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality